Home Resident Planning Applications (Resident) Applications on Scheme of Delegation Eligible for Call In

Applications on Scheme of Delegation Eligible for Call In

Applications on Scheme of Delegation Eligible for Call In

Pursuant to the Council’s published Scheme of Delegation, the applications set out in the Delegated List below are now the subject of a recommendation by a Planning Officer. Applicants and agents who have any queries regarding a recommendation contained on this list should contact the planning officer dealing with the application. Please note that a Councillor can request that an application is removed from the Delegated List and referred to the Planning and Regulatory Services Committee at any stage prior to 5pm on the date noted in the table below provided a sound planning reason is given.

ALL CALL IN REQUESTS TO PLANNING COMMITTEE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO EMAIL ADDRESS .   ALL REQUESTS SHOULD BE TITLED ‘CALL IN REQUEST’

The new IT System for Planning went live on 5th December 2022. Applicants, agents – and any third parties who may have an interest in a particular application –  are asked to note that under the new IT System the functionality of the system has changed and language/terminology used on the system is different to that used under the old system.  In particular, it should be noted that unlike the old IT system, the status of an application on the new IT system will no longer change when the application has been placed on a delegated list.  Therefore, the onus is on applicants, agents and any third parties who may have an interest in a particular application to check the weekly delegated lists which appear on the Council’s website every Thursday evening to determine if an application has been placed on the delegated list at www.armaghbanbridgecraigavon.gov.uk/resident/planning-applications-residents/

Members of the public should also note there are a number of identified technical issues with the new system.  The performance of the system will continue  to be monitored as part of the normal service management arrangements and the Council is working closely with the stakeholders including the suppliers to resolve the outstanding issues.  Any issues of concern regarding the new planning IT system should be forwarded to

Lists of delegated planning applications can be viewed in the table below.

  • You can use the search box below to find an application, try searching by: Application number, postcode or first line of address.
  • If the green “+” icon is visible click on it to reveal hidden columns.

Reference NumberLocationProposalAgent Name & AddressApplicant Name & AddressRecommendationReason for Refusal (Where applicable)Date Delegate List IssuedDeadline for Call in (applies to elected members only) 5pm on
LA08/2023/3139/OImmediately adjacent and to the north of 129 Gilford Road, Lurgan (site of 'Free Grace Hall' a previous place of religious assembly).Site for dwelling and garageHPA Architecture Ltd Suite 4 The Exchange
Goban Street
PORTADOWN
BT63 5AG
Samuel Davison T D Gibson & Co
Montrose House
17-21 Church Street
PORTADOWN
BT62 3LN
Approval (Objections received)27/06/202404/07/2024
LA08/2024/0086/FLands immediately north west of 6 Drummiller Lane, Drummiller, ScarvaErection of detached dwelling with attached garage and associated hard and soft landscapingThe Designworks Studio, 21 Annagora Road
Portadown
BT62 4JE
Stephen and Isla Brown, 46 Enniscrone Park
Portadown
BT63 5DQ
Approval (Objections received)27/06/202404/07/2024
LA08/2023/2668/O60 metres North and adjacent to No 4 Kernan Road, Kernan, Gilford, Co Down, BT63 6BUSite for single dwelling based on infill Warnock Consulting, 17 Rathfriland Street
Banbridge
BT32 3LB
Mr Eamon McCartan, 33 Drumaran Road
Kernan
Gilford
BT63 6BU
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.

2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the proposal if permitted, would create a ribbon of development along the Kernan Road.

3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the dwelling would, if permitted, result in a suburban style build-up of development, create a ribbon of development, and would therefore further erode the rural character of the countryside.

4. Having notified the agent under Article 3 (6) of The Planning (General Development Procedure) Order (Northern Ireland) 2015 that further details by way of an accurate biodiversity checklist is required to allow the Council to determine the application to ensure the proposal meets with the requirements of the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland; Policies NH 2, NH 4 and NH 5 of Planning Policy Statement 2 Natural Heritage and having not received this information, the Council refuses this application as it is the opinion of the Council that this information is material to the determination of this application.

5. Having notified the agent under Article 3 (6) of The Planning (General Development Procedure) Order (Northern Ireland) 2015 that further information is required by Environmental Health by way of a noise impact assessment to allow the Council to determine the application and having not received sufficient information, the Council refuses this application as it is the opinion of the Council that this information is material to the determination of this application.
27/06/202404/07/2024
LA08/2023/2985/FLands located 70 metres north of no. 129 Blackskull Road, Dromore, BT25 1JWErection of dwelling, garage and all associated site works (in substitution to that previously approved under LA08/2018/0160/F) Andy Stephens Matrix Planning Consultancy Saba Park
14 Balloo Avenue
Bangor
BT19 7QT
Ricardo Manso 17 Church Meadows
Dromore
BT25 1LZ
Refusal 1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and to Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. Having notified the agent under Article 3 (6) of The Planning (General Development Procedure) Order (Northern Ireland) 2015 that further details by way of an accurate biodiversity checklist and ecological statement (and any relevant surveys) is required to allow the Council to determine the application to ensure the proposal meets with the requirements of the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland; Policies NH 2, NH 4 and NH 5 of Planning Policy Statement 2 Natural Heritage and having not received this information, the Council refuses this application as it is the opinion of the Council that this information is material to the determination of this application.20/06/202427/06/2024
LA08/2023/2167/FApprox. 85 metres north-west of 119 Battleford Road
Benburb
Armagh
BT61 8BS
Erection of agricultural shed for storage of grain, with associated hardstanding and site works, and alterations to existing vehicular accessMcAleenan Architects + Interior Design Ltd
5 Dobbin Street
Armagh
Rod Carmichael
119 Battleford Road
Armagh
BT61 8BS
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.
2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 12 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that: it has not been demonstrated that the farm business has been established for at least 6 years; it has not been demonstrated that it is necessary for the efficient use of the agricultural holding; its scale is not appropriate for its location; it would not visually integrate into the local landscape; it has not been demonstrated that it would not have an adverse impact on natural heritage; and it has not been demonstrated that there are no suitable existing buildings on the holding that can be used.
3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 13 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that: the proposed development would be a prominent feature in the landscape; the site lacks long established natural boundaries and is unable to provide a suitable degree of enclosure for the building to integrate into the landscape; it relies primarily on the use of new landscaping for integration; it fails to blend with the landform; and therefore would not visually integrate into the surrounding landscape.
4. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the development would, if permitted, be unduly prominent in the landscape, and add to a ribbon of development along Battleford Road, and would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside.
5. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the development would, if permitted, add to a ribbon of development along Battleford Road.
6. The proposal is contrary to Paragraph 6.192 of the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland, and Policy NH 2 and Policy NH 5 of PPS 2: Natural Heritage, in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposed development is not likely to result in an unacceptable adverse impact on or damage to priority habitats and/or protected species.
20/06/202427/06/2024
LA08/2023/3017/F6 Brackenridge, Magheralin, Craigavon, BT67 0UEInstallation of velux window on roof and modification / replacement of existing gable window on southwest elevation (second floor) to include change to opaque glass and non-opening.Alina Holyst Alina Holyst Architects 11 Pine Valley
Rostrevor
Newry
BT34 3DE
Jarek Gudyma 6 Brackenridge
Craigavon
BT67 0UE
Approval (Objections received)20/06/202427/06/2024
LA08/2023/2584/OSouth and West of Cricket Club, Clare Road, Waringstown, CraigavonProposed residential housing and alterations to cricket club entranceT.J. Dreaning 135 Banbridge Road
Donaghcloney
Craigavon
BT66 7PJ
M H Harnett Banbridge Road
Waringstown
Craigavon
BT66 7QA
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policy QD1 of PPS7: Quality Residential Environments criteria (a), (b), (c), (e), and (f) as it has not been demonstrated that the development respects the surrounding context and is appropriate to the character and topography of the site, that features of the archaeological heritage and landscape features are identified, protected and integrated in a suitable manner into the overall design and layout of the development, that adequate provision is made for private open space and that appropriate access and parking can be provided for the proposal.
2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policies NH2 and NH5 of PPS2:Natural Heritage as it has not been demonstrated that the proposal is not likely to harm a European protected species or that the proposal is not likely to result in an unacceptable adverse impact on Habitats, Species or Features of Natural Heritage Importance.
3. The proposal is contrary to paragraphs 6.191- 6.192 of the SPPS and policy NH5 of PPS2: Natural Heritage as it would result in a threat to the continued well being of existing trees which are subject of a Tree Preservation Order
4. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy LC1 of PPS7 (Addendum) – Safeguarding the Character of Established Residential Areas as it has not been demonstrated that the proposed pattern of development is in keeping with the overall character and environmental quality of the established residential area or that the density is not significantly higher than that found in the established residential area;
5. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policies AMP1, AMP2 and AMP 7 of PPS3: Access, Movement and Parking as it has not been demonstrated that the proposal provides for an accessible environment for everyone and an appropriate access and parking arrangement.
6. The proposed development is contrary to paragraphs 6.16-6.17 of the SPPS and Policy BH 6 of PPS 6 as it will adversely change the character, integrity and original design intent of this part of the designed landscape of Waringstown House, Historic Park, Garden and Demesne.
7. The proposal is contrary to paragraph 6.8, of the SPPS and Policy BH 1 of PPS6: Planning, Archaeology and the Built Heritage as the site is immediately adjacent to and may contain part of the scheduled area of a Scheduled Historic Monument protected under the provisions of the Historic Monuments and Archaeological Objects (NI) Order 1995 and the proposal may involve direct archaeological impacts in breach of the Historic Monuments and Archaeological Objects (NI) Order 1995. The proposal will also represent an adverse change to the existing character and integrity of the monument’s setting.
8. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and policy FLD3 of PPS15 as it has not been demonstrated by way of a drainage assessment that adequate measures will be put in place so as to effectively mitigate the flood risk to the proposed development and from the development elsewhere.
20/06/202427/06/2024
LA08/2023/2353/FLands between 3 and 5 Glassdrumman Road
Poyntzpass
BT35 6SZ
Erection of two-storey detached dwelling and garage in substitution of planning approval ref: LA08/2022/1031/OAidan Cunningham
10 Cecil Street
Newry
BT35 6AU
Mr Edward Magill
3 Glassdrumman Road
Poyntzpass
Newry
BT35 6SZ
Approval (Objections received)13/06/202420/06/2024
LA08/2021/0125/F5 St. Marks Place
The Mall
Armagh
BT61 9BH
Restoration and change of use of listed building to three apartments and one bedsit at 5 St Marks Place, restoration and change of use of rear outbuildings to two terraced houses, and erection of two one bed semi-detached dwellings and one two bed detached to rear of site with ancillary works.DA Architects Ltd
Unit 6
Armagh Business Park
Hamiltonsbawn Road
Armagh
BT60 1HW
Coyle Group
49 Darkley Road
Armagh
BT60 3AX
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy QD 1 of Planning Policy Statement 7, Quality Residential Environments in that it has not been demonstrated that: the development respects the surrounding context and is appropriate to the character and topography of the site in terms of layout and hard surfaced areas; features of the built heritage, and landscape features have been protected and integrated in a suitable manner into the overall design and layout of the development; the landscaping arrangements are appropriate to assist the development’s integration with the surrounding area; and the design and layout will not create conflict with adjacent land uses and there is no unacceptable adverse effect on existing or proposed properties in terms of overlooking, loss of light, overshadowing, or other disturbance.
2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Planning Control Principle 1 of Planning Policy Statement 12, Housing in Settlements in that the proposed density is inappropriate and would result in town cramming.
3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy BH 12 of Planning Policy Statement 6, Planning, Archaeology and the Built Heritage in that it has not been demonstrated that trees and other landscape features contributing to the character or appearance of the Conservation Area are protected.
4. The proposed development is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy NH 2 of Planning Policy Statement 2, Natural Heritage, in that it has not been demonstrated that the development proposal: is not likely to harm a European protected species; and is not likely to harm any other statutorily protected species.
5. The proposed development is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy NH 5 of Planning Policy Statement 2, Natural Heritage, in that it has not been demonstrated that the development is not likely to result in the unacceptable adverse impact on, or damage to: priority species; and features of natural heritage importance, namely protected trees within the Conservation Area of Armagh.
6. The proposal is contrary to Paragraph 4.12 of the Strategic Planning Policy Statement in that it has not been demonstrated that sewerage from the site can be suitably handled to protect the water environment and to safeguard the residential and work environs.
13/06/202420/06/2024
LA08/2023/1867/F175m North of 33 Ednego Rd, BanbridgeExtension to existing commercial dog fun park comprising of dog walking area available on an hourly basis booked by an app appointment in advance.Stephen Spiers 76 Whitethorn Lane
Kinallen
BT25 2DL
Nikki Adams 1 Mayfield Grove
Kinallen
BT25 2QP
Approval (Objections received)13/06/202420/06/2024
LA08/2023/2036/F12,
Unit 1,
Newry Road,
Banbridge,
BT32 3HN
Extension to retail unit, relocation of hot food unit and pedestrian link to Ardery's Lane - to include new section of footpath, lighting columns, fencing/gates and cctv cameras.RPP Architects Ltd 155-157 DONEGALL PASS
BELFAST
Henderson Group Property 9 Hydepark Industrial Estate
Mallusk Road
Newtownabbey
BT36 4RT
Approval (Objections received)13/06/202420/06/2024
LA08/2023/2116/OBetween 53 & 55 Ballygowan Road, Banbridge, BT32 3QXSite for development (4no apartments)TJ Drenning 135 Banbridge Road
Donaghcloney
BT66 7PJ
Peter Irvine 55 Ballygowan Road
Banbridge
BT32 3QX
Refusal1. The proposed development is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement paragraphs 4.11 and 5.72 in that the proposed development would, if permitted, harm the living conditions of residents in No 55 Ballygowan by reason of overlooking and as a consequent lack of privacy.

2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement paragraph paragraphs 4.11 and 5.72 and Policy QD1 (Criteria a and h) of Planning Policy Statement 7 Quality Residential Development and Policy LC1 (a) of PPS 7 (Addendum) in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposal will create a quality and sustainable residential environment.

3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement paragraph 6.192 and Policy NH5 Habitats, Species or Features of Natural Heritage Importance of PPS 2 Natural Heritage in that it has not been demonstrated that the proposed development would not have an adverse impact on Protected Species.
13/06/202420/06/2024
LA08/2023/2780/F43a Main Street
Richhill
Armagh
BT61 9PJ
Proposed replacement of first floor windows on front elevationMrs Edith McAdams
156 Portadown Road
Richhill
BT61 9LN
Richhill Women's Institute
43 Main Street
Richhill
BT61 9PJ
Refusal1. The proposed development is contrary to Paragraph 6.12 of the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland, Policy BH 11 of Planning Policy Statement 6: Planning, Archaeology and the Built Heritage, and Policy DES 2 of A Planning Strategy for Rural Northern Ireland, in that it would adversely affect the setting of listed buildings on the grounds of the proposed material not being traditional or sympathetic.

2. The proposed development is contrary to Paragraphs 6.18 and 6.19 of the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland, Policy BH 12 of Planning Policy Statement 6: Planning, Archaeology and the Built Heritage, Policy DES 2 of A Planning Strategy for Rural Northern Ireland, in that it would adversely affect the character, appearance and setting of Richhill Conservation Area on the grounds of the proposed material not respecting the characteristics of buildings in the area, and not conforming with the guidance set out in the Richhill Conservation Area Guide: ‘Richhill: A Conservation Village.’
13/06/202420/06/2024
LA08/2023/1665/FSt Malachy's Primary School, 11 Chapel Lane, Armagh, BT61 7EGNew build St Malachy's Primary School (to include the demolition of the existing school) to provide a 7No. class base primary school with school meals accommodation and all associated site works (including boundary treatments, infrastructure, car parking and landscaping), with vehicular and pedestrian access from Chapel Lane and retention of pedestrian access from sameHamilton Architects
Hamilton House
3 Joy Street
Belfast
Trustees of St Malachys Primary School, Armagh
11 Chapel Lane
Armagh
BT61 7EG
Approval (Objections received)06/06/202413/06/2024
LA08/2023/2006/DCASt Malachy's Primary School, 11 Chapel Lane, Armagh, BT61 7EGDemolition of existing school building and portacabins. Removal of Chapel Lane road frontage walls, railings and gates and partial removal of retaining wall east of the entrance to enable visibility of oncoming traffic. Hamilton Architects
Hamilton House
3 Joy Street
Belfast
Trustees of St Malachys Primary School, Armagh
11 Chapel Lane
Armagh
BT61 7EG
Approval (Objections received)06/06/202413/06/2024
LA08/2024/0328/OLands immediately adjacent and south of 9 Redrock Road Collone BT60 2BESite for dwelling and garage and all associated site works within former playing field Sam Nicholson da architects ltd Unit 6 Armagh Business Park
Hamiltonsbawn Road
Armagh
Brenda McCall 12 Redrock Road
Collone
Armagh
BT60 2BE
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and to Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement. 2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and Policy CTY 2a of Planning Policy Statement 21, New Dwellings in Existing Clusters, on the grounds that the proposed development fails to comply with criterion 2, and 4, 5 of Policy CTY 2a. . 3. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and to Policy CTY 8 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that an approval would, if permitted, result in the creation of ribbon development along the Redrock Road.
4. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and to Policy CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposal would, if permitted create a ribbon of development and would therefore result in a detrimental change to the rural character of the countryside.
5. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement and to Policy OS 1 of Planning Policy Statement 8 Open Space, Sport and Outdoor Recreation in that the site meets the definition of open space and the development would if permitted result in the loss of existing open space and no exception has been provided for redevelopment in accordance with this policy.
06/06/202413/06/2024
LA08/2024/0406/RMLands between 11 & 14 Kilmore Drive, Kilmore, Armagh, BT61 8NLErection of dwelling and associated siteworksDavid McMaster David McMaster Architect Ltd 12A Mahon Industrial Estate
Portadown
BT62 3EH
Carol Martin 14a Bushfield Road
Moira
Approval (Objections received)06/06/202413/06/2024
LA08/2021/1548/FLands 70m east of 171 Mullaghbrack Road
Coolmillish
Markethill
Armagh
BT60 1QQ (junction of Gosford Road & Mullaghbrack Road)
Erection of camping site consisting of 5no Glamping Pods, shower/toilet building and ancillary works.Stephen Hughes NI Planning Consultants
45B Magheraville Road
Armagh
BT60 3PP
Cathal Curran 132 Markethill Road
Armagh
BT60 1LF
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to SPPS and to Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside and Policy TSM 6 & 7 of Planning Policy Statement 16 Tourism in that the site is not compatible with surrounding land uses and the use and built form will detract from the landscape quality and character of the surrounding area; access to the public road will prejudice road safety or significantly inconvenience the flow of traffic.

2. The proposal is contrary to SPPS and Policy CTY 13 and CTY 14 of Planning Policy Statement 21 Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that the proposed development is unable to provide a suitable degree of enclosure for the buildings to integrate into the landscape and is considered to be a prominent feature in the landscape. The new buildings would rely primarily on the use of new landscaping for integration into the landscape and it will create a ribbon of development along the Mullabrack Road resulting in a detrimental impact on rural character in this rural area.

3. The proposal is contrary to Planning Policy Statement 3, Access, Movement and Parking, Policy AMP 2, in that it would, if permitted, prejudice the safety and convenience of road users since it would encourage pedestrians to cross and re-cross Gosford Road thus increasing accident potential.
06/06/202413/06/2024
LA08/2022/1050/OLands 120m North East of 46 Carryhugh Road
Keady
Armagh
BT60 3ER
Site for single storey dwellingCollins & Collins Architectural Consultants
11 Marcus Street
Newry
BT34 1ET
Geraldine Murphy
45 Carryhugh Road
Keady
BT60 3LG
Refusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 1 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and could not be located within a settlement.

2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland and Policy CTY 6 of Planning Policy Statement 21: Sustainable Development in the Countryside in that: it has not been demonstrated that there are compelling and site specific reasons for a dwelling for the long term needs of the applicant; the applicant has not provided satisfactory evidence that a new dwelling is a necessary response to the particular circumstances of the case and that genuine hardship would be caused if planning permission were refused; and it has not been demonstrated that there are no alternative solutions to meet the particular circumstances of this case.
06/06/202413/06/2024
LA08/2024/0416/FLands 20m South of 25 Bleary Road, Bleary, Craigavon, BT63 5NEErection of Single storey Dwelling with garage and all associated works A Sloan David McMaster Architect Ltd 12a Mahon Industrial Estate
Portadown
BT62 3EH
Walter Graham 6 Grattans Lane
Banbridge
BT32 5DZ
Approval (Objections received)06/06/202413/06/2024
LA08/2022/0615/FLands approximately 80m South West of 17 Tullyhenan Road Banbridge BT32 4EYProposed erection of agricultural storage shed with associated site worksNI Planning Permission Scottish Provident Building
7 Donegall Square West
Belfast
BT1 6JH
Mr Henry McArdle 2 Lairds Road Katesbridge Banbridge BT32 5NNRefusal1. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Planning Policy Statement (SPPS) and Policies CTY1 & CTY12 of Planning Policy Statement 21, Sustainable Development in the Countryside on the grounds that there are no overriding reasons why this development is essential in this rural location and it has not been demonstrated that the proposal is necessary for the efficient use of the holding.
2. The proposal is contrary to the SPPS and Policy CTY12 of Planning Policy Statement 21 Sustainable Development in the Countryside, in that the applicant has not provided sufficient information to confirm that there are no suitable existing buildings on the holding or enterprise that can be used; that this alternative site away from the main farm holdings is essential for the efficient functioning of the business and that the proposal is sited beside existing farm buildings.
06/06/202413/06/2024
LA08/2024/0310/RMSite adjacent to and West of 25 Bleary Road, Craigavon, BT63 5NEErection of dwellingA Sloan David McMaster Architect Ltd 12a Mahon Industrial Estate
Portadown
BT62 3EH
Walter Graham 6 Grattans Lane
Banbridge
BT32 5DZ
Approval (Objections received)06/06/202413/06/2024
LA08/2021/0223/FReplacement of the existing wind turbine (51.5m hub height and 66.5m tip height) as approved in application Q/2012/0372/F with a V52 wind turbine up to 51.9m hub height and up to 77.9m tip height, electrical cabinets, hard standing area and all associated and ancillary works.Lands 335m north of 30 Garvaghy Road, Banbridge BT32 3SZResolve Planning & Development Innovation Factory Forthriver Business Park 385 Springfield Road Belfast BT12 7DGHill Power Ltd Fairbank 108a Silesia Dhoo Tromode Douglas Isle of Man M2 5LDApproval (Objections received)06/06/202413/06/2024